iMED CONFERENCE® 18.0

YOUR IDEA. YOUR VOICE.

Six finalists. Two challenging questions. One stage where evidence, ethics and persuasion meet.

FINALISTS ANNOUNCED Meet the Clinical and Research finalists below.
02 CATEGORIES
06 FINALISTS
02 INTERNSHIPS
PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETITION

MORE THAN HAVING THE RIGHT ANSWER.

Can you defend an idea when the answer is not obvious?

iPitch challenges Health Sciences students to build persuasive arguments around complex medical and scientific questions.

Participants submit a short video pitch before the strongest candidates advance to a live presentation at iMed Conference®.

THE JOURNEY

FROM CAMERA TO THE STAGE.

01 MARCH 16 — MAY 12

PITCH SUBMISSION

Candidates recorded and submitted their arguments.

02 JURY A

INITIAL SELECTION

Pitches were evaluated to select the strongest candidates.

03 SEPTEMBER 1

FINALISTS

Three Clinical and three Research finalists were selected.

04 MAIN EVENT

FINAL PITCH

The six finalists take their arguments live to the iMed stage.

THE CHALLENGE

TWO QUESTIONS. NO EASY ANSWERS.

01 CLINICAL

BETWEEN HOPE AND HARM: WHO DECIDES?

A newborn with Trisomy 18 places parents and physicians on opposite sides of an extraordinarily difficult decision.

At what point does “doing everything” become doing harm?

READ THE CLINICAL CASE ↗
02 RESEARCH

PRIVATE GENES, PUBLIC CONSEQUENCES.

A genomic study uncovers information that could transform several lives — but the participant explicitly asked not to receive it.

Does the right not to know end when genetic information directly affects others?

READ THE RESEARCH CASE ↗
MEET THE FINALISTS

SIX VOICES. TWO DEBATES.

The strongest pitches now move from video submission to live argumentation.

CATEGORY 01

CLINICAL

Between Hope and Harm: Who Decides?

Jorge Borbinha
FINALIST 01

Jorge Borbinha

NOVA Medical School, Lisbon

João Mendes
FINALIST 02

João Mendes

NOVA Medical School, Lisbon

Laura Ferros de Azevedo
FINALIST 03

Laura Ferros de Azevedo

NOVA Medical School, Lisbon

CATEGORY 02

RESEARCH

Private Genes, Public Consequences

Sara Conceição
FINALIST 01

Sara Conceição

NOVA Medical School, Lisbon

Margarida Peixeiro
FINALIST 02

Margarida Peixeiro

NOVA Medical School, Lisbon

Macy Keneisha
FINALIST 03

Macy Keneisha

New Vision University, Georgia

THE PRIZES

SPEAK UP. STAND OUT.

The live competition does not end when the applause does.

1
FIRST PLACE

540€ DIOSCOPE

Voucher in Insight Courses

+

360 DAYS

UWorld Clinical QBank Voucher

2
SECOND PLACE

360€ DIOSCOPE

Voucher in Insight Courses

+

360 DAYS

UWorld Clinical QBank Voucher

3
THIRD PLACE

180€ DIOSCOPE

Voucher in Insight Courses

+

360 DAYS

UWorld Clinical QBank Voucher

FOR THE WINNER OF EACH CATEGORY

THE PRIZE THAT TAKES YOU BEYOND THE STAGE.

Each category winner receives the opportunity to undertake an international internship in their respective field.

MUNICH
01 / CLINICAL

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY.

Munich, Germany

Professor Dr. Markus Krane
INTERNSHIP WITH Professor Dr. Markus Krane

Cardiovascular surgeon and Clinical Director at the German Heart Centre in Munich.

LONDON
02 / RESEARCH

GENE THERAPY.

London, United Kingdom

Dr. Konstantina Tetorou
INTERNSHIP WITH Dr. Konstantina Tetorou

Researcher at UCL's Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health in London.

COMPETITION DOCUMENTS

WANT THE FULL STORY?

iPITCH COMPETITION 18.0

SIX FINALISTS. ONE LIVE STAGE.

The argument has been prepared. Now it is time to defend it.

MEET THE FINALISTS ↑